"What we call chaos is just patterns we haven't recognized. What we call random is just patterns we cant decipher." -
Chuck Palahniuk.
The provocative rhetoric between the players on the orchestrated
Middle East chessboard continues, as the serious threat of the growing conflict between America, Israel, Iran, Russia and China, plunging the planet into a third world war escalates. This concrescence of release language around cataclysmic events, return of a messianic entity, extraterrestrial invasion/disclosure and a Golden Age is coalescing around the Hegelian dialectic of order out of chaos from false flag events like terrorism and world wars. A Israeli-Iranian war and a possible wider Middle East war would not only fulfill
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's fervent prayer for the return of the
Hidden Imam, the Mahdi, but the implementation of the Magi's grand plan for a
New World Order of the Ages.
We have already seen the manifestation of the previous World Wars, the Cold War and the 9/11 Attacks/War on Terrorism. Therefore it is not hard to envision the full realization of
Werner Von Braun's warning about the last card, especially given the extraterrestrial narrative in our popular culture and considering the global wait for a planetary government lead by a returning Savior. Christianity awaits
Christ, Islam expects the
Imam Mahdi, Buddhism is waiting for the
Maitreya Buddha, Hinduism anticipates the
Kalki Avatar, the Jews are looking for their
Messiah, the Mayans prophesied about the return of
Quetzalcoatl, and so-called New Agers long to see their
Cosmic Christ. In recent speeches, Ahmadinejad repeatedly prayed for the hasty return of the Mahdi, the messianic figure. Ahmadinejad even declared that he is willing to create the conditions necessary for the arrival of the Mahdi. He believes that his mission in life will be to play a vital role in ushering in the new age of the Mahdi,
"...pave the path for the glorious reappearance of Imam Mahdi, may Allah hasten his reappearance..."
Certainly, the following headlines, runs parallel with this path. Here, two stories indicates that Iran is becoming a nuclear threat and developing low-flying cruise missiles.
While Europe remains preoccupied with its own slow-motion crisis and other global powers continue to be mesmerised by the bizarre spectacle of European officials' efforts to rescue the euro (and thus the global financial system), clouds of war are massing over Iran once more. For years, Iran has been pursuing both a nuclear program and the development of long-range missiles, which points to only one conclusion: the country's leaders are intent on building nuclear weapons, or at least on reaching the technological threshold beyond which only a single political decision is required to achieve that end. - The Australian.
Iran is developing an advanced low-flying cruise missile that could potentially carry a non-conventional warhead, Arieh Herzog, director of the Defense Ministry's Homa Missile Defense Agency, said on Wednesday... "The Iranians are developing a capability that within several years, they will have cruise missiles that can fly at low altitudes and carry non-conventional warheads," Herzog said. - Jerusalem Post.
Author Michael Burleigh, writing in the
Daily Mail, a news outfit out of Britain is declaring that Iran is a rabid rogue state that could tip the world into a new dark age.
That rampaging mob of ‘students’ storming the British Embassy in Tehran on Tuesday, lobbing petrol bombs, ransacking the building, burning the Union Jack and threatening to hold hostage terrified members of staff inside the compound, was a deeply worrying spectacle for those of us who have studied the Iranian regime over the years. The mayhem followed a vote in Iran’s parliament to downgrade diplomatic relations with Britain - a response to the tough new financial sanctions imposed by London last week over Iran’s nuclear programme, after the International Atomic Energy Authority warned that Iran is getting ever closer to building a bomb. These protesters were clearly orchestrated by the Iranian regime, for the mayhem could never have taken place without sanction in a country where secret police stalk the streets, torture is endemic, criminals are executed in public and foreign embassies are closely guarded and monitored. Far from being students, many of the thugs involved were elite members of Iran’s paramilitary Basiji brigades, a hard-core volunteer outfit under the control of the country’s Revolutionary Guards, who answer to the country’s top cleric, the Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei... What we are witnessing is a desperate and sclerotic regime which feels increasingly cornered and is lashing out - not that Iran is any the less dangerous for that. The Iranians have threatened dire consequences if such an attack took place, including firing long-range ballistic missiles, thought to be more accurate than the Scud missiles Saddam Hussein launched against Israel during the first Gulf War. They are also likely to retaliate against any neighbouring state that allows Israel to fly through their airspace towards Iran, including Turkey and Iraq. They may risk attacking U.S. forces stationed in Iraq or the nearby Gulf states, sucking the U.S. directly into the conflict. Significantly, only the U.S. military has the necessary firepower to deal with Iran’s formidable military machine. If the U.S. was dragged in, Iran would not only engineer conflagration in the Middle East. It has also threatened to cut off oil supplies from the region by unleashing Chinese Silkworm missiles or suicide-bomber boats against tankers in the Straits of Hormuz, the world’s vital oil lifeline. Industry experts calculate this would instantly send the price of oil soaring three times its present price to $300 or more a barrel - which would be even more catastrophic for our ailing economies than the unresolved eurozone crisis.
As a result of this "rampaging mob,"
Britain has ordered a closure of the Iran embassy in London.
Britain said on Wednesday it had ordered the immediate closure of Iran's embassy in London and had closed its own embassy in Tehran after it was stormed by protesters. "The Iranian charge (d'affaires) in London is being informed now that we require the immediate closure of the Iranian embassy in London and that all Iranian diplomatic staff must leave the United Kingdom within the next 48 hours," British Foreign Secretary William Hague told parliament. "We have now closed the British embassy in Tehran. We have decided to evacuate all our staff and as of the last few minutes, the last of our UK-based staff have now left Iran," he said. Hague also announced that Iranian ambassadors had been summoned in countries across Europe to receive strong protests over the storming of the British embassy. - Telegraph.
A move that is not going down well with the Iranian regime, who have lashed out at the
"Little Satan," and promised that the United Kingdom will suffer consequences of envoy's expulsion.
For Iran, Britain is the "Little Satan", second only as an irritant to the "Great Satan" of the United States. But the events of the past few days - namely the ransacking of the British embassy - have shown that Britain is now the number one target when it comes to the country's fury at the West. Diplomatic relations that were already chilly at best are now in the deep freeze. The spark was ostensibly the UK's decision to impose stringent sanctions over Iran's nuclear programme. But the consequences for Iran - more international condemnation, anger and probably more sanctions - may only serve to make life more difficult for the Iranian regime. Which is why many analysts believe an internal power struggle may be the real explanation for the latest spat. Protesters set fire to a Union Jack flag outside British Embassy in Iran. Iran's Guardian Council, which approved a parliamentary bill to downgrade diplomatic ties with the UK, is dominated by hardline conservative clerics. The move led to the apparently orchestrated attacks on the British Embassy and a residential compound. President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad - hardly a moderate himself - is left with the fallout of what seems to have been a show of strength from his rivals for power. - Sky News.
Iran said Britain's decision to close the Iranian embassy in London was "hasty" and that it would lead to further retaliation: "The foreign ministry spokesman ... described the move as ... hasty and added that naturally the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran would take further appropriate action regarding the issue," Tehran's state TV reported. - Ynetnews.
This promise is looking really close to becoming a reality, as the London Times is quoting Israel intelligence officials as saying that recent satellite images show this week's reported blast in
Isfahan was 'no accident.'
A mysterious blast which reportedly rocked Isfahan in western Iran on Monday damaged a key nuclear facility in the city, the Times of London reported on Wednesday. On Monday, Haaretz cited Iranian media as reporting that an explosion was heard near Isfahan, home to a uranium conversion plant operational since 2004. According to reports by the semi-official Fars news agency, frightened residents called the fire department after the blast, forcing the city authorities to admit there had been an explosion. Residents reported that their windows shook from the explosion's force. At first, Iranian officials denied the reports, with the governor of Isfahan later alleging that the blast was caused by an accident that had occurred during a nearby military drill. However, a report in the Times on Wednesday alleged that the blast had not been a military accident, and that the city's nuclear facility was damaged. The report quotes Israeli intelligence officials who based their conclusion on updated satellite images showing smoke billowing from the direction of the conversion plant. According to the Israeli sources, there was "no doubt" that the blast had damaged the nuclear facility, and that the explosion was not an "accident." - Haaretz.
Whether it was an accident from a military drill or nuclear test, or attack from an external source, Ahmadinejad is obviously in high preparations for war, especially given the increasing possibilities that Israel will carry out a secret strike.
The top US military officer told Reuters on Wednesday he did not know whether Israel would alert the United States ahead of time if it decided to take military action against Iran. General Martin Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, also acknowledged differences in perspective between the United States and Israel over the best way to handle Iran and its nuclear program. He said the United States was convinced that sanctions and diplomatic pressure was the right path to take on Iran, along with "the stated intent not to take any options off the table" - language that leaves open the possibility of future military action. "I'm not sure the Israelis share our assessment of that. And because they don't and because to them this is an existential threat, I think probably that it's fair to say that our expectations are different right now," Dempsey said in an interview as he flew to Washington from London. Asked whether he was talking about the differences between Israeli and US expectations over sanctions, or differences in perspective about the future course of events, Dempsey said: "All of the above." He did not elaborate. He also did not disclose whether he believed Israel was prepared to strike Iran... There has been concern that if world powers cannot nudge Iran into serious nuclear negotiations, then Israel, which feels threatened by Iranian nuclear aspirations, will attack. Asked directly whether Israel would alert the United States ahead of time if it chose to go forward with military action, Dempsey replied flatly: "I don't know." - Jerusalem Post.
Of course, the dark horse in all of this mix is
China and what cards they will play as oppose to or in agreement with either America or Russia. Certainly, the following video should give some indication as to what position the Chinese government will take. Observe the these words:
Major General Zhang Zhaozhong, a professor from the Chinese National Defense University, said China will not hesitate to protect Iran even with a third World War... Professor Xia Ming: "Zhang Zhaozhong said that not hesitating to fight a third world war would be entirely for domestic political needs...." And don't forget Russia, which recently said it is preparing to retaliate against NATO and has put radar stations on combat alert: "Russia is another ally of Iran, with similar policy to that of China. Toward Iran."
WATCH: NTDTV analysis of the burgeoning crisis.
A grand plan is at work here. It seems that what we are looking at is, the final orchestration of the plans within the Hegelian Dialectic to bring forth unprecedented chaos and to ultimately herald in under the guise of peace, the disclosure of the extraterrestrial presence as our saviors.